➡️ The way you are treated during a job interview offers insights into how you may be treated as an employee.
👉 Remember, companies need employees just as much as candidates need a job.
✅ Strive for a win-win situation!
Allow me to share a memorable job interview I had quite some (long) time ago that left a lasting impression on me.
❌ It was a moment that checked every wrong box.
The appointment was scheduled for 19:00, but despite the late hour, I was offered no food and no water.
The interview was essentially a never-ending list of questions, brushing aside any inquiries I had about the job.
When it came to describing the position and compensation package, what I recall is the following statement: “You’ll receive a base salary sufficient for your spouse’s shopping needs; the rest you must earn.”
After enduring two hours of intensive questioning, I was informed that I would be meeting with the Vice President, who was still at the office at 21:00.
I distinctly remember a rather clinical greeting, which began with the question: “Are you familiar with the bacon and eggs metaphor?”
To which I replied in the negative.
I was then told: “In the bacon and eggs metaphor, the chicken is involved, but the pig is fully committed.
I want you to be fully committed.”
With the sharpness of my youth, I boldly asked: “What’s in it for me?”
The response was unequivocal: “If you meet your targets, you’ll retain your position in the company.”
Two days later, I sent a thank-you email, ending with: ” I have decided not to pursue this opportunity”.
We can all agree that the interview is a crucial juncture for both the employer and the candidate.
They should both recognize its significance, make an effort to present their best qualities, and assess whether a mutual fit exists.
So, what did I learn?
🔸The way they treat you during the interview is an indication of the way they will treat you as an employee.
🔸One-way communication does not constitute a relationship.
🔸If the primary goal is to prevent termination solely based on meeting your performance targets, it is a sign that the employer should dedicate more effort to “sell” their company and the position.
🔸Conducting interviews at 21:00 was indicative of the number of hours the company expected from its employees.
As a recruiter, what should you consider?
✅ Candidates have options; they can choose to proceed or not.
✅ An interview isn’t an interrogation; it’s a two-way conversation.
✅ Treat candidates as equals; they seek jobs, AND you need their skills.
✅ Show investment in candidates (onboarding, long-term prospects) instead of treating them as plug-and-play.
✅ Above all, candidates are more than just a CV; explore their potential, not just their history.
What do you think?
PS: All of this is true.
Copyright ©
